Jueves 26 de Mayo de 2011 07:40

Ecuadorians Win Judgement Against Chevron in Amazon Case, Company Refuses to Pay

Written by Keph Senett
   
Amazonian Amazonian istock

In 2008, Ecuador became the first country in the world to grant "inalienable rights" to nature in its Constitution. A recent judgement against oil giant Texaco (now Chevron) regarding the company's practices in the Amazon, and the company's very public refusal to honor the ruling, sheds light on the enforcement challenges associated with this kind of legislation. As other countries enact similar measures, like Bolivia, and consider environment-centered constitutional changes, like Turkey, it's important to monitor the outcome of this case. 

As a result of a cooperative effort between Ecuador's Constitutional Assembly and the Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund (a Pennsylvanian group providing legal assistance to governments and community groups trying to mesh human affairs and the environment), changes were written into Ecaudor's constitution in 2008, giving nature the "right to exist, persist, maintain and regenerate its vital cycles, structure, functions and its processes in evolution". Further, the legislation mandates that the government take "precaution and restriction measures in all the activities that can lead to the extinction of species, the destruction of the ecosystems or the permanent alteration of the natural cycles."

jungle-slice

According to an article published in the Guardian, the new language suggested a shift in the legal framework used to handle environmental lawsuits. Whereas previously, damages and reparations had been measured in anthropocentric way -- that is, based on the impacts to humans -- these laws included provision for humans "to sue on behalf of an ecosystem."

The laws were enacted during Ecuador's legal battle with Chevron, and indeed, were conceived in response to "Ecuador's growing disillusionment with foreign multinationals". Now, three years after the constitutional modification, the conflict continues. 

The legal battle between Ecuador (the suit was launched on behalf of 30,000 Ecuadorian plaintiffs) and Chevron has been dragging on since 1993. On February 14, 2011, after 18 years of campaigning, an Ecuadorian court found the company liable for $18 billion in damages to the Amazon.

mangroves-slice

In an official statement, Chevron vowed to appeal. "The Ecuadorian court's judgment is illegitimate and unenforceable. It is the product of fraud and is contrary to the legitimate scientific evidence," the statement reads. "Chevron will appeal this decision in Ecuador and intends to see that justice prevails." 

Now, three months after the ruling, the company has not only refused to honor to the judgement (with a spokesperson now-famously claiming they would fight "until Hell freezes over"), but has also launched an attack on the integrity of the Ecuadorian courts. "United States and international tribunals already have taken steps to bar enforcement of the Ecuadorian ruling. Chevron does not believe that today's judgment is enforceable in any court that observes the rule of law," the company said in the same statement.

Based on the complaint of the company, U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan has agreed to hear a case to determine whether the court's judgement should be recognized. As reported by The New York Times, "the Ecuadorean justice system is scheduled to go on trial before a federal judge in New York."

amazon-boat-slice

The case is gaining international notoriety, and capturing the attention of activists -- and shareholders. According to an article published on SFGate.com, New York state's comptroller Tom DiNapoli, who is responsible for The New York State Common Retirement Fund, a shareholder in Chevron, has called on the company to settle the case. "Investors don't derive any benefit from this never-ending courtroom drama," DiNapoli said, in a press release. "The entire case is looming like a hammer over shareholders' heads." Still, the oil company refuses to budge.

A tireless ally in this legal battle, environmental activism group Amazon Watch has produced a video and petition on their site that provides background information and a forum to voice your support for the Ecuadorian plaintiffs in this case. Watch the video below, and sign the petition here.

 

Meanwhile, under pressure from an international coalition of academics and environmental activists, the United Nations is considering the adoption of the Universal Declaration of the Rights of Mother Earth, submitted by Bolivia.

"We hope that one day a Universal Declaration of the Rights of Mother Earth will stand as the companion to the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights as one of the guiding covenants of our time," said citizen's advocacy organization Council of Canadians campaigner Maude Barlow. "It took a long time to get the world to accept the Universal Declaration of Human Rights... It will not be an easy struggle to have the rights of nature understood and adopted. But it will happen one day."

new-leaf-slice

Related Stories:

Bolivia Set to Pass Historic 'Law of Mother Earth' Which Will Grant Nature Equal Rights to Humans.

Turkey considering ecological approach to new constitution. Read more here.

Add comment


3 Comentarios

  • Comment Link Katherine Wilson Jueves 01 de Diciembre de 2011 09:18 posted by Katherine Wilson

    Industrialization has been choking the life from our planet for centuries. It's time the world wakes up to the fact that the Earth is the only home we have, and we all must share it - not just between ourselves but with everything else that lives here. Our consumerism, and disdain for cultures which value the environment as much as the humans which populate it, has to move over and make room for respecting our home.

    But this scares a LOT of people, who believe 'having more stuff' is a right; therefore they also believe in humanity's 'right to exploit' - and they'll fight for them, tooth and nail.

    The United States, along with all the other industrialized nations, will consistently refuse to recognize the proposed UN resolution, even if by some miracle it should pass. There's no way the US is going to 're-tool' our Constitution to give rights to the environment - Congress would see that move as cutting itself off at the knees.

    Esta dirección electrónica esta protegida contra spambots. Es necesario activar Javascript para visualizarla
  • Comment Link Robert Croghan Domingo 11 de Septiembre de 2011 08:27 posted by Robert Croghan

    You are absolutely right on.. shareholders should be held responsible for the companies actions.. and help personally responsible of the risks. This corporate protection is crap... companies should be charged with crimes they are people under the law and the directors help personally responsible. That might wake a few of them up

    Esta dirección electrónica esta protegida contra spambots. Es necesario activar Javascript para visualizarla
  • Comment Link colette spooner Domingo 29 de Mayo de 2011 12:32 posted by colette spooner

    The Oil Company/ies need to honour the policy put into place, and recognise a need for change to use sustainable resources such as hemp worldwide, shareholders should be made aware of the risks of gambling and accept responsibility for their contribution to enable such devastation worldwide. Its no laughing matter anymore there is a need for Justice here, the people are fed up worldwide.

    Esta dirección electrónica esta protegida contra spambots. Es necesario activar Javascript para visualizarla
Puerto Vallarta & Riviera Nayarit App WiP-PVR
Download from your favorite App store

Google Ads