Friday, 16 September 2011 09:43

Peru Approves Indigenous Law as Wikileaks Exposes US Concerns

Written by Luis Domínguez
   
Ollanta Humala Ollanta Humala cc Antonio Cruz/ABr

On September 6th, Peru’s new indigenous Prior Consultation law was approved by President Ollanta Humala. It is an important development for the indigenous rights cause, just a few days after Wikileaks released a cable from the US Embassy in Lima, exposing a growing concern by the US Government about the indigenous movement.

The Prior Consultation law will require that indigenous people be consulted before any mining, timber or petroleum projects are begun on their traditional lands. Private companies will have to seek agreement with rural communities for projects that affect them or their ancestral territories, but it does not give the communities the right of veto.

cc mavik2007"What we want to do with this law is to have the voice of indigenous people be heard, and have them treated like citizens, not little children who are not consulted about anything," said Humala after signing the law, according to Yahoo News.

A similar law was repeatedly blocked by the previous president Alan Garcia, arguing that it would deter investment and benefits for all Peruvians. But President Humala is looking at a bigger picture, one that includes reducing social conflicts, ensuring respect for all Peruvians’ human rights and introducing the indigenous worldview into Peru’s body of legislation.

This is just the latest step of a worldwide movement fighting for the rights of indigenous peoples, following Bolivia’s Law of Mother Earth signed early this year by indigenous president Evo Morales.

The movement got a major boost on September 2007, when the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples was adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations, by a majority of 144 states in favour, 4 votes against and 11 abstentions. The four countries that voted against it were the United States of America, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. Since its adoption all of them have reversed their position and endorse the Declaration.cc Adam Jones Ph D
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             cc Adam Jones Ph D
Nevertheless the voting is telling, as the Wikileaks cables show. In this cable titled “Evo Morales is our president: the Anti-System” written by Deputy Chief of Mission at the US Embassy in Peru,  James Nealon, the indigenous peoples defending their lands in Peru are described as “anti-system radicals”, and it continues expressing concern over protests which urged stopping a “planned hydroelectric project, repealing a new water law and ending concessions relating to mining and other extractive industries.”

The cable released by Wikileaks on August 30th 2011 expresses a concern about an important shift of growth paradigm: “…But if these kinds of structural factors have played a role in recent protests (refs), so has a radical anti-system political project that is seeking to take political advantage of them to undermine Peru's progress, weaken the government and lay the groundwork for a more systematic assault on the pro-growth model. Public and private statements by the diverse and not necessarily unified leaders of the anti-system movement paint a compelling portrait of their real aims, which can be summarized in the words of one Peruvian indigenous leader that "Evo Morales is our President."”

cc US Mission Geneva                                                                                                                                                                                                              cc US Mission Geneva

At another cable released on August 30th, 2011 the US also expresses alarm over the right for the Indigenous to be consulted on any law pertaining to them. This is now known as the "right to free, prior and informed consent," as stated in the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, which is also the right protected by the new law in Peru. The cable is from the US Embassy in La Paz, Bolivia, dated Jan. 28, 2008.

"Although most indigenous leaders seem to view the UN Declaration as a 'feel good' document that will give them more inclusion in the public sector, some leaders are citing the Declaration in support of concrete aims like self-governance and control over land and resources," states the US Embassy in La Paz, Bolivia. "Post will watch for further developments, particularly with regards to property rights and potential sovereignty or self-rule issues."

Is the US Government worried about indigenous peoples attaining “self-governance”, “property rights” or “sovereignty” over their ancestral lands? Aren’t all men created equal as stated on the US Declaration of Independence?

                                                                                                                                                                                                           cc Luna sin Estrellas

Confronting worldviews are behind this issue. On one side, there is the Western civilization view of progress and unstopped growth. On the other, there is the evidence that continue growth is taking humanity to a point of no-return, and that the planet won’t be able to resist if every country follows that same path. Hence, the green movement around the world, the back to basics attitude, and the return to old values eradicated by the industrialized era.

"We indigenous people can contribute to solving the energy, climate, food and financial crises with our values." said Bolivian Foreign Minister David Choquehuanca. Maybe is time we start taking a deep look at those values.

 

 

Add comment


6 Comments

  • Comment Link Es Sunday, 01 January 2012 12:51 posted by Es

    Adrianna your grammar would send the indigenous into the dark ages. If you really are a teacher there are children who NEED an education to survive in the developing world. The natives seem to be doing quote well without it.

    James, without change these cultures will soon perish. Rather have these people alive to tell the days of their ancestors than erased from history all together. That being said, if they want change let them. If not, so be it.

    This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
  • Comment Link James T-K Friday, 09 December 2011 01:35 posted by James T-K

    In regards to Adriana Kamphuis, it is people like you who westernise this part of the world. Did you not just read this article? Great for wanting to help but WHY DON'T YOU TEACH CHILDREN IN DEVELOPED COUNTRIES ABOUT INDIGENOUS HISTORY? (If you truely care!) I can imagine and I know for sure, thousands of many people like you go in with cameras and technology, teaching english, this just encourages these beautiful cultures to become the same as our useless western culture

    This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
  • Comment Link lynn evans Tuesday, 06 December 2011 01:52 posted by lynn evans

    BRAVO PERU and BOLIVIA!! This is the DIRECTION We HAVE to go for the WORLD to Survive

    This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
  • Comment Link adriana kamphuis Friday, 02 December 2011 12:01 posted by adriana kamphuis

    I am so happy with this positive direction . You can see and read that the government and the people are failing in the U>S>A>. The ones that peaceful demonstrate for a better world, get pepper sprayed I am a teacher and would like to help your country by teaching the children voluntary in places where there are no schools.

    This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
  • Comment Link James Casey Thursday, 22 September 2011 10:22 posted by James Casey

    As an citizen of the United States o America, I am ashamed of my government. They have the power to do so much good.

    This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
  • Comment Link Jacob Wednesday, 21 September 2011 10:02 posted by Jacob

    Of course the U.S., Canada, Austrailia, and New Zealand would have voted no on the U.N. declaration of Indidenous Rights--those countries exist because the ancestors of their current citizens comitted countless atrocities against ingidenous peoples in acquiring the land the lands they now occupy.

    I am glad to see this movement, though, I hope it doesn't punish regular people who did nothing historically to create this situation.

    I'm caucasian, but thanks to films such as 'The Last of the Mohicans' and 'Dances With Wolves' I have always been of the opinion that historically what people in my country did to Native Americans was heinously and morally wrong. I have an interest in the world as it was, and am keen to see the end of the destruction of nature at the expense of the masses for the benefit of a few.

    I hope indigenous peoples realize that not all non-indigenous people are responsible for what happened to them and some--like me--feel ashamed of their ancestors. The same crimes comitted historically are continuing to be comitted in different fashions today. By this I mean to say that our society is destroying the natural environment of the Earth and this is a crime on the level of the greatest wrongs ever comitted.

    Hopefully indigenous mindsets prevail and we can return to a level of sanity in which we don't consume all life on Earth, but rather we live with it and our Mother--the Earth.

    This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Puerto Vallarta & Riviera Nayarit App WiP-PVR
Download from your favorite App store

Google Ads